请求翻译

Restorative Justice Movement (Restorative Justice) is the 1970s rise of the 20th century in Western countries a judicial reform movement that seeks to change the traditional mode of the defects of the criminal justice movement in the field of vision and a broader considerations, as well as the harm caused to crime How can eliminate these injuries. With the traditional pattern of criminal justice, restorative justice that crimes directly against the interests of victims and community order, and stressed that the main stakeholders involved in crime-handling procedures in the past and take communication and consultation to find ways to eliminate the best way to affect crime , who advocated criminal penalties of a non-responsible manner, compensate for the damage caused by criminal acts. Although the movement is still experiencing self-exploration and the amendment process, but still a profound impact on the criminal justice system towards the West and gradually play a role in the world.
Restorative justice as the academic concepts were introduced in China only a short span of less than 10 years time, but in recent years with the goal of building a harmonious society by criminal and Kuanyan of economic policy-oriented, restorative justice has gradually become a hot topic aroused Theory and Practice of the industry sector concerns. There is no doubt that the emergence of restorative justice for the criminal justice reform in China has provided a valuable exploration of new ideas, but with some provinces and cities have restorative justice characteristics of the reform measures adopted, on restorative justice own merits and China's integration in the local issues arising from the growing academic controversy. Is restorative justice and the theoretical basis of the content of what the traditional criminal justice model What are the advantages compared with its own whether there is a theory difficult to overcome the shortcomings, whether it is appropriate to introduce our restorative justice, it will introduce how to achieve restorative justice the localization issues such as China's scholars has been on the books of restorative justice in the presentation and focus on the search. In this paper, based on Western academics and scholars of China studies, introduced in the basic theory of restorative justice on the basis of academic analysis and comparison focus on restorative justice and scholars debate the merits of the various arguments put forward their own views of the author, in the final The China Construction based on the restorative justice system design.

很辛苦！！

Restorative Justice Movement (Restorative Justice) is the 1970s rise of the 20th century in Western countries a judicial reform movement that seeks to change the traditional mode of the defects of the criminal justice movement in the field of vision and a broader considerations, as well as the harm caused to crime How can eliminate these injuries. With the traditional pattern of criminal justice, restorative justice that crimes directly against the interests of victims and community order, and stressed that the main stakeholders involved in crime-handling procedures in the past and take communication and consultation to find ways to eliminate the best way to affect crime , who advocated criminal penalties of a non-responsible manner, compensate for the damage caused by criminal acts. Although the movement is still experiencing self-exploration and the amendment process, but still a profound impact on the criminal justice system towards the West and gradually play a role in the world.
Restorative justice as the academic concepts were introduced in China only a short span of less than 10 years time, but in recent years with the goal of building a harmonious society by criminal and Kuanyan of economic policy-oriented, restorative justice has gradually become a hot topic aroused Theory and Practice of the industry sector concerns. There is no doubt that the emergence of restorative justice for the criminal justice reform in China has provided a valuable exploration of new ideas, but with some provinces and cities have restorative justice characteristics of the reform measures adopted, on restorative justice own merits and China's integration in the local issues arising from the growing academic controversy. Is restorative justice and the theoretical basis of the content of what the traditional criminal justice model What are the advantages compared with its own whether there is a theory difficult to overcome the shortcomings, whether it is appropriate to introduce our restorative justice, it will introduce how to achieve restorative justice the localization issues such as China's scholars has been on the books of restorative justice in the presentation and focus on the search. In this paper, based on Western academics and scholars of China studies, introduced in the basic theory of restorative justice on the basis of academic analysis and comparison focus on restorative justice and scholars debate the merits of the various arguments put forward their own views of the author, in the final The China Construction based on the restorative justice system design.

The recoverable judicial movement was the 1970s emerges in a Western country judicial reform movement, how this was for the purpose of changing the tradition criminal justice pattern malpractice's movement to consider the injury which in a broader field of vision the crime created as well as can eliminate these injuries. Is different with the tradition criminal justice pattern, the recoverable judicature thought what crime direct violation is victim's law profit and community's order, stressed that the related benefit main body participates in the crime disposal procedure coming and adopting the communication consultation the way to seek eliminates the crime influence the best means that advocated that the perpetrator undertakes the responsibility by the non-penalty's way, the harm which because the atonement the criminality creates. Although this movement was still experiencing the self-exploration and the revision process, but still profoundly affected the West criminal justice system to move toward and around the world to play the role gradually.
the recoverable judicature takes the academic concept to introduce our country only then short less than ten year, but along with recent years construction harmonious social objective's statement and the wide strict Jinan criminal activity policy's guidance, the recoverable judicature became a hot topic of discussion gradually, has caused the practical realm and the theorists attention. Without a doubt, the recoverable judicature's appearance provided one for our country criminal justice reform to have the exploration value new mentality, however had recoverable judicial characteristic reform measure releasing along with partial provinces and cities, has caused the educational world argument day by day about the recoverable judicature's fit and unfit quality and in our country's native place fusion question. Actually recoverable judicature's connotation and are the rationale anything, compares with the tradition criminal justice pattern has any merit, whether its oneself does have the theory flaw which overcomes with difficulty, whether our country is suitable the introduction recoverable judicature, how since the introduction words will realize recoverable judicature's questions and so on localilzation have also been our country scholars in try about in the recoverable judicature's work to introduce and to inquire about. This article bases the Western scholar and our country scholar's research, in the introduction recoverable judicature elementary theory's foundation, analyzes the contrast educational world emphatically about the recoverable judicial fit and unfit quality argument and to scholars' each argument proposed that author own opinion, based on this will propose finally our country constructs the recoverable legal system design.

太长了没兴趣。
好多都读不痛的，楼主自己好好看看啊
慎选

（短一点我就帮你翻了，今天没空）

The recoverable judicial movement (Restorative Justice) was the 1970s emerges in a Western country judicial reform movement, how this was for the purpose of changing the tradition criminal justice pattern malpractice's movement to consider the injury which in a broader field of vision the crime created as well as can eliminate these injuries. Is different with the tradition criminal justice pattern, the recoverable judicature thought what crime direct violation is victim's law profit and community's order, stressed that the related benefit main body participates in the crime disposal procedure coming and adopting the communication consultation the way to seek eliminates the crime influence the best means that advocated that the perpetrator undertakes the responsibility by the non-penalty's way, the harm which because the atonement the criminality creates. Although this movement was still experiencing the self-exploration and the revision process, but still profoundly affected the West criminal justice system to move toward and around the world to play the role gradually. the recoverable judicature takes the academic concept to introduce our country only then short less than ten year, but along with recent years construction harmonious social objective's statement and the wide strict Jinan criminal activity policy's guidance, the recoverable judicature became a hot topic of discussion gradually, has caused the practical realm and the theorists attention. Without a doubt, the recoverable judicature's appearance provided one for our country criminal justice reform to have the exploration value new mentality, however had recoverable judicial characteristic reform measure releasing along with partial provinces and cities, has caused the educational world argument day by day about the recoverable judicature's fit and unfit quality and in our country's native place fusion question. Actually recoverable judicature's connotation and are the rationale anything, compares with the tradition criminal justice pattern has any merit, whether its oneself does have the theory flaw which overcomes with difficulty, whether our country is suitable the introduction recoverable judicature, how since the introduction words will realize recoverable judicature's questions and so on localilzation have also been our country scholars in try about in the recoverable judicature's work to introduce and to inquire about. This article bases the Western scholar and our country scholar's research, in the introduction recoverable judicature elementary theory's foundation, analyzes the contrast educational world emphatically about the recoverable judicial fit and unfit quality argument and to scholars' each argument proposed that author own opinion, based on this will propose finally our country constructs the recoverable legal system design.

Restorative Justice Movement (Restorative Justice) is the 1970s with the rise in Western countries a judicial reform movement that aimed at changing the traditional shortcomings of the criminal justice model campaign in a wider perspective, considering the harm and crime How can eliminate these injuries. With the traditional mode of different criminal justice, restorative justice that crime is directly against the interests of victims of the law and order in the community, stressed that the main stakeholders involved in crime into the process of consultations to communicate and to find ways to eliminate the best way to impact on crime , Who advocated a non-criminal penalties for the responsible way to make up for the damage caused by criminal acts. Although the movement is still experiencing self-exploration and the amendment process, but still a profound impact on the criminal justice system towards the West and gradually play a role in the world.
Restorative justice was introduced as an academic concept in China for only less than 10 years time, but in recent years with the goal of building a harmonious society by criminal and Kuanyan of economic policy-oriented, restorative justice has gradually become a hot topic, cause The practical and theoretical circles of concern. There is no doubt that restorative justice is a criminal justice reform in China has provided a valuable exploration of new ideas, but with some provinces and cities have restorative justice characteristics of the reform measures introduced, on restorative justice's own merits and In China's local integration of the growing problem of the academic arguments. Is restorative justice and the content of what is the basis of theory, with the traditional criminal justice model compared with what merits, its own whether there is a theory difficult to overcome the shortcomings, China's suitability for the introduction of restorative justice, the introduction of what it will achieve restorative justice Issues such as the localization of China's scholars have been on the books of restorative justice in the presentation and focus on the search. In this paper, based on Western academics and scholars of China, in introducing the basic theory of restorative justice on the basis of comparative analysis focused on the academic merits of restorative justice scholars and the controversy over the various arguments put forward my own opinion, in the end This based on the Construction of China's resumption of the judicial system design.