高手翻译成英文，55分悬赏。不要机器翻译

给点分吧

Way from the economic perspective, a way of dumping is an anti-normal economic order, undermine the fairness of a brutal economic approach. In this sense, the use of modern Antonio are looking at is barbaric. Read Antonio, Shylock did not understand the ploys and playing tricks, he can not use the anti-"dumping" strategy to deal with Antonio. Except Fresh sulks , resulting in resentment and retaliation Antonio of the worst things, on anything. Shylock from that point in "hard" money, by squeezing the absolute, the absolute squeeze performance except in the form of cruel, there is also a kind of barbarism, his back is also a matter of course infamy. And Antonio's economic strategy implemented to enable him to obtain a relatively high value on in the economy, he benefits a lot, he's far from an absolute to extract excess profits can be the same date and language. He exploited every citizen, every citizen from the profits there. His gentle knife instead of his fame and fortune. Shylock exploitation of a small number of people, the majority of people Antonio exploitation. ShylockLifts knifeone, people will be condemned as cruel callous thugs, oneLifts knifeAntonio, he was praised as a "gentleman's love money, in a proper way" model. It should be noted that Antonio acts more deceptive. If he was regarded as a model of humanist or humanist idea of the vector, it is true that some dislocation. Just imagine, he and Shylock same means of exploitation by wealthy, living a carefree same rich life, which have him eligible for what the banner of those who cite humanism? To put it bluntly, he can only be classified as Shylock that One type of figures. Shylock him with the contradictions and conflicts, in the final analysis, or for benefits purposes. This Shylock is very clear. While at his side, but has a hidden and deceptive. Because of his generosity and sincere friend to Shylock conceal him out of the capitalist economy, commercial areas, so that he alone is the key to the economy, control of Venice. Shylock bias against him, he treats others the principle of selectivity, but also with the humanist, he advocated respect for people, important people, the concept of human equality and propositions far. The surface, such as Antonio represents a civilized people, they in Venice has a good reputation and prestige, however, civilization and barbarism bad line, in the exploitation of the general public what he does are civilized or savage?

Looking from the economical way, the dumping way is one kind in any case constant rule Jinan order, destroys the fair one barbaric economical way. Said in this significance that with modern people's judgment looked Antonio is also barbaric. The trick which summer Locker cannot read Antonio to play the acrobatics which and plays with, he is also unable to utilize instead “dumping” the strategy to cope with Antonio. Besides the fresh sulks, produces hates and retaliates bad plan of the Antonio, cannot find way out again. Summer Locker's obtained that “hard” money, is depending on absolute squeezing out, this kind of absolute squeezing out in formally besides performance for cruelty, but also has is also the performance is one kind of barbarism, he carries on the back the infamy to be also natural. But Antonio implements the economical strategy caused him to obtain the relatively rich value, in economy, he materially beneficial very much, his excess profit far from absolutely squeezed out may be mentioned in the same breath. He exploits each resident, from each residential there profit. His gentle knife instead lets him achieve both fame and fortune. Summer Locker exploits the small number of people, Antonio exploits the most people. The summer Locker knife, by the human was condemned at one fell swoop for the roughshod hoodlum, the Antonio knife, is at one fell swoop “the gentleman is avaricious by the person praise, takes it is correct” the model. Should say that Antonio's behavior has a bigger fraudulence. If regards as him the humanities person's model or the humanism thought carrier, that indeed some dislocations. Suppose, he makes one's own way similarly with summer Locker depending on the exploitation method, similarly the carefree abundant life, which has he also been having what qualifications to make the humanism to hold the flag? Has exposed, he can only converge in summer Locker that kind of character. He and summer Locker's contradictory conflict, in the final analysis, for benefit goal. This in the summer Locker aspect is the very clear perspicuity. But in his that side, actually has the confidentiality and the fraudulence. Because his enjoying doing charitable things with covered him to the friend to sincerely push aside summer Locker invests this principle commercial economy domain, good let him alone control the economy, was controlling Venice. He has the prejudice to summer Locker, he favors one and discriminates against the other treats people the principle, also causes him the respect person who initiates with the humanities person, to regard the person, the person and the person equality idea and the position differs greatly. On the surface, Antonio et al. are representing the civilization, they are having the good reputation and the prestige in Venice, however civilized and barbaric difference, actually to the general populace's exploitation in he is civilized or barbaric?

Way from the economic perspective, a way of dumping is an anti-normal economic order, undermine the fairness of a brutal economic approach. In this sense, the use of modern Antonio are looking at is barbaric. Read Antonio, Shylock did not understand the ploys and playing tricks, he can not use the anti-"dumping" strategy to deal with Antonio. Except, resulting in resentment and retaliation Antonio of the worst things, on anything. Shylock from that point in "hard" money, by squeezing the absolute, the absolute squeeze performance except in the form of cruel, there is also a kind of barbarism, his back is also a matter of course infamy. And Antonio's economic strategy implemented to enable him to obtain a relatively high value on in the economy, he benefits a lot, he's far from an absolute to extract excess profits can be the same date and language. He exploited every citizen, every citizen from the profits there. His gentle knife instead of his fame and fortune. Shylock exploitation of a small number of people, the majority of people Antonio exploitation. Shylock one, people will be condemned as cruel callous thugs, one Antonio, he was praised as a "gentleman's love money, in a proper way" model. It should be noted that Antonio acts more deceptive. If he was regarded as a model of humanist or humanist idea of the vector, it is true that some dislocation. Just imagine, he and Shylock same means of exploitation by wealthy, living a carefree same rich life, which have him eligible for what the banner of those who cite humanism? To put it bluntly, he can only be classified as Shylock that One type of figures. Shylock him with the contradictions and conflicts, in the final analysis, or for benefits purposes. This Shylock is very clear. While at his side, but has a hidden and deceptive. Because of his generosity and sincere friend to Shylock conceal him out of the capitalist economy, commercial areas, so that he alone is the key to the economy, control of Venice. Shylock bias against him, he treats others the principle of selectivity, but also with the humanist, he advocated respect for people, important people, the concept of human equality and propositions far.The surface, such as Antonio represents a civilized people, they in Venice has a good reputation and prestige, however, civilization and barbarism bad line, in the exploitation of the general public what he does are civilized or savage?

From the economic perspective, dumping way is a normal economic order, and to destroy the fair a barbarous way. In this sense, the use of modern perspective and savage Antonio is. Shylock't read the trick of Antonio and play trick, he also cannot use "dumping" strategies to deal with Antonio. Besides sulks and resentment and revenge of the decision, Antonio is helpless. Shylock's point "hard" money, is absolutely, the absolute crush squeeze in form is cruel, but there is also a savage, for he is granted. Back to scold Antonio and economic strategy earned him a relatively rich value, economic benefit, he, he is far from the excess profit squeeze. Can absolutely He exploited every citizen, from every citizen there. His gentle sword instead of making his fame. Shylock exploitation minority, Antonio exploitation majority. Shylock every knife, he was condemned as a cruel thugs, Antonio every knife, has been praised as "the love of money, the gentleman youdao" model. Should say, Antonio's behavior has greater deceptive. If he regarded as humanists sample or humanism, that some of the carrier. Just think, he also with Shylock, orin means rich batten on the rich as a carefree life, which he has made the banner of humanism. Now, he can be the kind of character for Shylock. He with Shylock conflicts, the bottom line, or for the benefit of purpose. It is very clear in Shylock. And in his party, but latent and deceptive. Because of his generosity and to disguise his friend sincerely, Shylock will out a capitalist commercial economy, good let him alone, controls the Venice dominate the economy. His preconception of Shylock and the principle of the others he cherry, also make him and humanists who advocated the respect and equality of human value, the concept and distant. On the surface, Antonio who represent the civilization, they have a good reputation in Venice and prestige, however civilization and a savage, to the general public in the exploitation of whether he is civilization or savage?